INFOGRAPHICS: HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION
INFOGRAPHIC 1: THE HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION ECOSYSTEM
INFOGRAPHICS: HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION
“The Heritage Documentation Ecosystem: From Assets to Action”
[MAIN VISUAL: Circular diagram with 5 interconnected sections]
CENTER CIRCLE: “HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION”
Icon: 🔄 (Recycling symbol)
Subtitle: “Turning Vulnerability into Resilience”
SPOKE 1: “IDENTIFY” (Top right, #1E90FF)
Icon: 🔍 Magnifying glass
Key Elements:
- UNESCO Classification: ISIC/CPC/ISCO codes
- Asset Inventory: Buildings, landscapes, knowledge
- Threat Assessment: Fire, conflict, climate, neglect
Statistic: “Only 15% of world heritage has comprehensive digital records”
SPOKE 2: “DOCUMENT” (Right, #228B22)
Icon: 📱 Smartphone + 📡 Satellite
Tools Pyramid:
text
TOP: Professional (€50k+) Laser scanners, drones with RTK, thermal imaging MIDDLE: Prosumer (€1k-10k) LiDAR iPhones, DSLR kits, basic drones BASE: Accessible (Free-€500) Smartphone apps, free software, community knowledge
Key Fact: “Smartphone photogrammetry can document 85% of heritage needs”
SPOKE 3: “PROCESS” (Bottom right, #8B4513)
Icon: 💾 Server + 🧠 Brain
Workflow:
text
RAW DATA → Process → Analyze → Store (Photos/scans) (Software) (AI tools) (Cloud/archive)
Data Points:
- Notre-Dame: 1 billion data points
- Typical church: 50,000 photos needed
- Processing time: 1-48 hours per object
SPOKE 4: “APPLY” (Bottom left, #FF8C00)
Icon: 💰 Money + 🏛️ Building
Applications:
- Restoration: 3D models guide craftspeople
- Funding: Data = better grant applications
- Policy: Evidence for protection laws
- Education: Virtual access for all
Statistic: “Sites with digital documentation receive 3x more funding”
SPOKE 5: “SHARE” (Left, #9370DB)
Icon: 🌐 Globe + 👥 People
Channels:
- Open Access: 70% of data should be public
- Community Control: 20% for local access only
- Restricted: 10% for sacred/sensitive content
Impact: “Digital twins reach 1000x more people than physical sites”
FOOTER STATISTICS BAR:
text
[🔥] 3 heritage sites lost DAILY to disasters [📱] 6 billion smartphones can document heritage [💰] $1 billion donated after Notre-Dame fire [🇺🇦] 1,200+ Ukrainian sites documented under fire [🌍] 90% of cultures have NO digital preservation
INFOGRAPHIC 2: THE NOTRE-DAME TIMELINE
INFOGRAPHICS: HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION
“The Digital Resurrection: Notre-Dame de Paris”
[TIMELINE: Horizontal ribbon with key dates]
2010: THE FORESIGHT
Icon: 🔬 Microscope
Visual: Andrew Tallon with laser scanner
Key Fact: “Academic curiosity became salvation blueprint”
Data: 1 billion data points captured
2019: THE FIRE
Icon: 🔥 Fire
Visual: Burning spire collapsing
Key Moment: “15 hours that threatened 850 years of history”
Damage:
- Spire destroyed
- Lead roof melted
- Oak framework lost
- Stone vaults damaged
HOUR 0-24: EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Icon: 🚨 Siren
Actions:
- Data Retrieval: Tallon’s scans recovered
- Stabilization: Laser-guided supports
- Assessment: 3D models of damage
Quote: “The scan held up the cathedral when stone couldn’t”
2020-2022: DIGITAL RECONSTRUCTION
Icon: 🖥️ Computer
Process:
text
SCAN → MODEL → TEST → BUILD
Craft Integration:
- Digital: Exact measurements from scans
- Traditional: Hand-hewn oak, medieval techniques
- Hybrid: Laser-guided traditional carpentry
2023-2024: PHYSICAL RESTORATION
Icon: 🛠️ Tools
Numbers:
- 1,000 ancient oaks harvested
- 250 master craftspeople
- 5 specialized workshops
- 0 modern materials in reconstruction
Ethics: “Restore, don’t recreate”
2024: REBIRTH
Icon: ✨ Sparkle
Achievements:
- Spire restored to 1857 design
- Lead roof replaced with identical materials
- All craftspeople’s names in new rooster
Cost: €846 million (90% from donations)
KEY INSIGHTS SIDEBAR:
[💡] Lesson 1: “Document BEFORE disaster”
[💡] Lesson 2: “Academic work = emergency resource”
[💡] Lesson 3: “Digital precision + traditional craft = best results”
[💡] Lesson 4: “Data enables funding”
COMPARISON BOX:
text
WITH 2010 SCAN: • Restoration time: 5 years • Cost: €846M • Accuracy: 99.9% • Authenticity: High WITHOUT SCAN: • Estimated time: 15+ years • Estimated cost: €1.5B+ • Accuracy: ~85% • Authenticity: Compromised
INFOGRAPHIC 3: UKRAINE’S DIGITAL RESISTANCE
INFOGRAPHICS: HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION
“Documenting Heritage Under Fire: The Ukrainian Model”
[MAIN VISUAL: Split map of Ukraine showing documented sites]
THE SCALE OF LOSS
Statistics Grid:
text
[🏛️] 1,200+ cultural sites damaged/destroyed [📱] 500+ volunteers documenting [🕒] 72 hours average to document before destruction [💾] 50TB+ of preservation data created [🌐] 30+ countries supporting documentation
DOCUMENTATION METHODS
4-Column Grid:
1. RAPID RESPONSE (Red zone)
Icon: ⚡ Lightning
Tools: Smartphones, basic cameras
Time: Minutes per object
Risk: Extreme
Example: “Documenting frescoes as shells fall”
2. PLANNED DOCUMENTATION (Amber zone)
Icon: 📅 Calendar
Tools: Drones, DSLRs, scanners
Time: Hours to days
Risk: High
Example: “Scanning churches before front advances”
3. COMMUNITY-LED (Safe zones)
Icon: 👥 People
Tools: Shared equipment, training
Time: Flexible
Risk: Low
Example: “Locals documenting family archives”
4. INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT (Global)
Icon: 🌍 Globe
Tools: Satellite imagery, remote processing
Time: Ongoing
Risk: None
Example: “Volunteers processing data from abroad”
TECHNOLOGY STACK
Pyramid Diagram:
BASE: ACCESSIBLE (80% of work)
- Smartphone photogrammetry
- Basic photography
- Oral history recording
Cost: Free-€500
MIDDLE: ENHANCED (15% of work)
- Drones (with permits)
- DSLR rigs
- Audio recording kits
Cost: €1,000-10,000
TOP: PROFESSIONAL (5% of work)
- Laser scanners
- Thermal cameras
- Satellite access
Cost: €10,000+
DATA FLOW
Process Diagram:
text
[Field Collection] → [Secure Transfer] → [Remote Processing]
📱 ☁️ 🖥️
[Ukrainian Team] [Encrypted Cloud] [Global Volunteers]
[Analysis] → [Storage] → [Future Use]
📊 💾 🔮
[Condition Reports] [Multiple Backups] [Reconstruction Blueprints]
ETHICAL FRAMEWORK
Decision Matrix:
text
QUESTION: Should we document this? • Human safety FIRST • Cultural significance NEXT • Resource availability LAST QUESTION: Who sees the data? • Community: Immediate access • Researchers: Controlled access • Public: Filtered access • Adversaries: No access QUESTION: When to share? • During conflict: Limited sharing • Post-conflict: Gradual release • Reconstruction: Full access
IMPACT METRICS
Before/After Bars:
text
FUNDING ACCESS: Before war: 15% of sites had documentation After documentation: 65% eligible for reconstruction funds COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: Before: 100 volunteers After: 5,000+ trained documentarians INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT: Before: Limited awareness After: 30+ countries providing resources
KEY INSIGHTS
[🛡️] Documentation as Resistance: “Preserving culture is fighting back”
[🤝] Global-Local Partnership: “Technology + community = resilience”
[💾] Digital Lifeboats: “When physical fails, digital survives”
[🔮] Future Foundation: “Today’s scans = tomorrow’s restoration”
INFOGRAPHIC 4: THE UNESCO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
INFOGRAPHICS: HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION
“Speaking the Language of Value: UNESCO 2025 Framework”
[MAIN VISUAL: Flowchart showing classification process]
WHY CLASSIFY?
3-Column Comparison:
WITHOUT CLASSIFICATION:
text
Description: "Old church needs repair" Perceived as: Cost center Funding: Charitable donations Policy impact: Low Measurement: Subjective
WITH CLASSIFICATION:
text
Description: "ISIC 9130: Conservation services" Perceived as: Economic activity Funding: Economic development grants Policy impact: High Measurement: Quantitative
THE 3-LEVEL SYSTEM
Nested Box Diagram:
LEVEL 1: ASSETS (What we preserve)
- Buildings (ISIC 9122)
- Landscapes (ISIC 9142)
- Artifacts (CPC 38961)
- Knowledge (Intangible heritage)
LEVEL 2: ACTIVITIES (What we do)
- Documentation (CPC 83819)
- Conservation (ISIC 9130)
- Education (ISIC 8552)
- Tourism (ISIC 7911)
LEVEL 3: ACTORS (Who does it)
- Craftspeople (ISCO 7316)
- Conservators (ISCO 3334)
- Managers (ISCO 1431)
- Volunteers (Community)
ECONOMIC MAPPING
Case Study Boxes:
NOTRE-DAME RESTORATION:
text
ISIC 4100: Construction ISIC 9130: Conservation services ISIC 1629: Wood product manufacturing ISCO 7115: Carpenters Jobs created: 1,000+ Economic impact: €1.2 billion
COMMUNITY MUSEUM:
text
ISIC 9102: Museum activities ISIC 8230: Event organization CPC 96310: Performance services ISCO 3433: Museum technicians Jobs created: 15-50 Economic impact: Local multiplier 3x
FUNDING MATRIX
4-Quadrant Grid:
QUADRANT 1: CULTURAL FUNDS
- UNESCO Emergency Fund
- National endowments
- Private foundations
Requires: Heritage significance proof
QUADRANT 2: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
- Regional development banks
- Tourism grants
- Job creation programs
Requires: Economic impact data
QUADRANT 3: TECHNOLOGY GRANTS
- Tech company CSR
- Innovation funds
- Research grants
Requires: Technical innovation
QUADRANT 4: COMMUNITY FUNDS
- Crowdfunding
- Local government
- Membership models
Requires: Community engagement
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS
5-Step Process:
STEP 1: INVENTORY
- List all heritage assets
- Basic documentation
- Threat assessment
STEP 2: CLASSIFY
- Match to UNESCO categories
- Identify economic activities
- Map workforce needs
STEP 3: VALUE
- Calculate economic impact
- Identify funding gaps
- Create business case
STEP 4: FUND
- Target appropriate funders
- Use classification language
- Track against categories
STEP 5: MEASURE
- Report using standard metrics
- Show impact by category
- Refine classification
SUCCESS METRICS
Before/After Comparison:
text
GRANT SUCCESS RATE: Before classification: 22% After classification: 67% FUNDING AMOUNTS: Before: Average €5,000 After: Average €50,000 POLICY INFLUENCE: Before: Reactive After: Proactive COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: Before: Limited participation After: Structured involvement
QUICK REFERENCE
Common Codes Table:
text
ACTIVITY | ISIC CODE | CPC CODE ---------------------------------------- Museum operation | 9102 | 96230 Conservation | 9130 | 83990 Craft production | 1629 | 38997 Documentation | 7420 | 83819 Education | 8552 | 92911
INFOGRAPHIC 5: GET STARTED GUIDE
INFOGRAPHICS: HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION
“Your Heritage Documentation Journey: Start Today”
[MAIN VISUAL: Pathway with 5 milestones]
MILESTONE 1: ASSESS
Icon: 📋 Clipboard
Questions to Answer:
text
1. What heritage matters to you? (Personal/Community) 2. What's its current state? (Good/Poor/Critical) 3. What threats does it face? (Time/Neglect/Development) 4. Who cares about it? (Community/Experts/No one) 5. What resources exist? (Photos/Memories/Documents)
Output: Priority list (1-5 sites to document first)
MILESTONE 2: EQUIP
Icon: 🛠️ Toolbox
Budget-Based Options:
€0-100 (SMARTPHONE WARRIOR):
- Your phone camera
- Free apps: PhotoScan, Polycam
- Cloud storage: Google Drive
- Time: Your weekends
€100-1,000 (COMMUNITY CHAMPION):
- Basic DSLR + tripod
- Drone (under 250g)
- Lighting kit
- Processing software trial
€1,000-10,000 (PROFESSIONAL START):
- Mirrorless camera system
- Basic laser scanner rental
- Drone with RTK
- Software licenses
€10,000+ (INSTITUTIONAL):
- Professional scanner
- Full software suite
- Team training
- Long-term storage
MILESTONE 3: DOCUMENT
Icon: 📸 Camera
The 5-Phase Method:
PHASE 1: CONTEXT (1 hour)
- Overall site photos (4 corners + center)
- GPS location recording
- Community stories (audio/video)
- Historical research summary
PHASE 2: EXTERIOR (2-4 hours)
- Building elevations (all sides)
- Architectural details (close-ups)
- Condition issues (cracks, damage)
- Surrounding environment
PHASE 3: INTERIOR (2-4 hours)
- Room-by-room documentation
- Artifact inventory
- Structural elements
- Lighting/ventilation assessment
PHASE 4: DETAIL (Variable)
- High-detail photogrammetry
- Specific damage documentation
- Material samples (photos)
- Craft techniques recording
PHASE 5: METADATA (1 hour)
- File organization
- Naming conventions
- Backup creation
- Access permissions
MILESTONE 4: PROCESS
Icon: 💻 Computer
Software Stack:
FREE/OPEN SOURCE:
- Photogrammetry: Meshroom, COLMAP
- 3D Modeling: Blender
- Point Clouds: CloudCompare
- GIS: QGIS
- Storage: Internet Archive, Wikimedia
PROFESSIONAL:
- Photogrammetry: RealityCapture, Metashape
- CAD: AutoCAD, Revit
- Analysis: Agisoft, Pix4D
- Storage: AWS, Azure Heritage
Workflow:
text
Photos → Process → Model → Analyze → Store
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
100-1000 1-48 hrs 3D file Reports Cloud+
↓
Share/Use
MILESTONE 5: APPLY
Icon: 🎯 Target
4 Application Paths:
PATH A: PRESERVATION
- Condition reports
- Restoration proposals
- Maintenance schedules
- Risk mitigation plans
PATH B: EDUCATION
- Virtual tours
- School curricula
- Public lectures
- Digital exhibits
PATH C: ECONOMIC
- Grant applications
- Tourism development
- Job creation plans
- Business partnerships
PATH D: COMMUNITY
- Memory preservation
- Skill development
- Cultural continuity
- Future planning
QUICK START PROJECTS
30-Day Challenge Grid:
WEEK 1: LEARN
- Day 1: Scan household object
- Day 3: Document family photo
- Day 5: Map local landmark
- Day 7: Join online community
WEEK 2: PRACTICE
- Day 8: Photograph local building
- Day 10: Create 3D model
- Day 12: Write condition report
- Day 14: Share with community
WEEK 3: APPLY
- Day 15: Identify at-risk site
- Day 17: Create documentation plan
- Day 19: Gather team
- Day 21: Begin documentation
WEEK 4: IMPACT
- Day 22: Process data
- Day 24: Create presentation
- Day 26: Share with stakeholders
- Day 28: Plan next project
- Day 30: Celebrate + reflect
COMMON PITFALLS
Avoid These Mistakes:
text
❌ "I need perfect equipment to start" ✅ Start with what you have, upgrade later ❌ "I'll document everything at once" ✅ Start small, build momentum ❌ "I'll do it all myself" ✅ Engage community from day one ❌ "I'll process as I go" ✅ Document first, process later ❌ "I'll keep data to myself" ✅ Share early, share often
SUCCESS METRICS
Track Your Progress:
text
QUANTITY: - Sites documented: [ ] /10 goal - Objects scanned: [ ] /100 goal - Community members engaged: [ ] /50 goal - Hours volunteered: [ ] /100 goal QUALITY: - Data completeness: 0-100% - Community satisfaction: 0-5 stars - Funding secured: €0-€goal - Policy changes influenced: 0-5
NEXT STEPS
After Mastering Basics:
- Specialize: Choose photography, scanning, or community work
- Certify: Get formal training in heritage documentation
- Teach: Train others in your community
- Scale: Document entire neighborhoods/regions
- Advocate: Use data to influence policy
[FOOTER MOTIVATION]
“The best time to document heritage was yesterday. The second best time is today. Your curiosity today becomes someone’s history tomorrow.”
INFOGRAPHIC 6: ETHICS DECISION TREE
INFOGRAPHICS: HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION
“Navigating Heritage Ethics: A Decision Guide”
[MAIN VISUAL: Flowchart tree with yes/no branches]
START: Should we document this site?
Considerations:
- Cultural significance
- Threat level
- Community interest
- Resource availability
[DECISION POINT 1: COMMUNITY CONSULTATION]
Question: “Is this site significant to a living community?”
YES → Path A: Community-Led
text
Steps: 1. Identify community leaders 2. Hold consultation meetings 3. Establish guiding committee 4. Co-create documentation plan 5. Ongoing community review
NO → Path B: Expert-Led
text
Steps: 1. Research historical significance 2. Consult academic experts 3. Follow professional standards 4. Plan for future community engagement
[DECISION POINT 2: ACCESS CONTROL]
Question: “Does the site have spiritual/secret significance?”
YES → Path C: Restricted Access
text
Protocols: • Limited documentation • Controlled data access • Community approval for use • No public sharing without consent
NO → Path D: Open Access
text
Protocols: • Comprehensive documentation • Public data sharing • Educational use encouraged • Commercial use with agreements
[DECISION POINT 3: TRAUMA PRESERVATION]
Question: “Does the site show evidence of trauma/violence?”
YES → Path E: Memory Preservation
text
Approach: • Document damage as historical record • Consult affected communities • Consider memorialization • Balance restoration with testimony
NO → Path F: Restoration Focus
text
Approach: • Document for restoration purposes • Focus on original state • Prioritize structural integrity • Consider practical use
DATA MANAGEMENT ETHICS
4-Layer Pyramid:
LAYER 1: OWNERSHIP (Base)
- Community owns their heritage
- Institutions are custodians, not owners
- Clear agreements before documentation
LAYER 2: ACCESS (Middle)
- Tiered access levels
- Community controls sensitive data
- Public benefits from open data
LAYER 3: USE (Upper)
- Non-commercial use: Generally permitted
- Commercial use: Revenue sharing
- Educational use: Encouraged
- Research use: With attribution
LAYER 4: FUTURE (Top)
- Data preservation plans
- Intergenerational transfer
- Technology migration
- Continuous consent model
CONSENT FRAMEWORK
4 Types of Consent:
INFORMED CONSENT:
- Full understanding of documentation
- Knowledge of potential uses
- Right to withdraw
- For: All living communities
RETROSPECTIVE CONSENT:
- Post-documentation approval
- Community review of data
- Option to restrict
- For: Urgent documentation
PROXY CONSENT:
- Community representatives
- Cultural authorities
- Legal guardians
- For: Vulnerable communities
PRESUMED CONSENT:
- Significant public benefit
- Low sensitivity
- Broad community support
- For: Non-controversial sites
CASE STUDIES MATRIX
4 Ethics Scenarios:
SCENARIO 1: SACRED SITE
- Site: Indigenous ceremonial ground
- Challenge: Spiritual significance vs. preservation need
- Solution: Limited documentation, community control, no public access
SCENARIO 2: CONFLICT SITE
- Site: Bullet-riddled church
- Challenge: Preserve trauma vs. restore function
- Solution: Document damage, community decides restoration level
SCENARIO 3: PRIVATE PROPERTY
- Site: Historic family home
- Challenge: Personal ownership vs. cultural value
- Solution: Owner agreements, controlled access, benefit sharing
SCENARIO 4: ENDANGERED KNOWLEDGE
- Site: Dying craft technique
- Challenge: Preserve vs. appropriate
- Solution: Knowledge holder control, limited recording, apprenticeship focus
ETHICS CHECKLIST
[✅] Before Documentation:
- Community consultation completed
- Consent forms prepared
- Data management plan created
- Cultural protocols understood
[✅] During Documentation:
- Respect boundaries
- Follow community guidance
- Document sensitively
- Regular check-ins
[✅] After Documentation:
- Share results with community
- Honor access agreements
- Proper attribution
- Ongoing relationship maintenance
[✅] Long-term:
- Data preservation
- Regular consent renewal
- Benefit sharing
- Intergenerational planning
RED FLAGS
Stop Documentation If:
text
🚩 Community opposition emerges 🚩 Spiritual/cultural violations occur 🚩 Safety risks increase 🚩 Data misuse is likely 🚩 Trust is broken
Resolution Process:
- Immediate pause
- Community consultation
- Issue resolution
- Relationship repair
- Revised approach or withdrawal
ETHICS RESOURCES
Quick Reference:
text
International Standards: • UNESCO 2003 Convention • ICOMOS Ethics • UN Declaration on Indigenous Rights National Laws: • Cultural heritage protection acts • Indigenous rights legislation • Data protection laws Community Protocols: • Local cultural guidelines • Traditional knowledge systems • Community-developed frameworks
[FOOTER PRINCIPLE]
“Better to document nothing than to document wrong. Relationships matter more than data. Trust is the most valuable tool in heritage work.”
DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
Color Palette:
text
Primary Heritage Brown: #8B4513 Digital Blue: #1E90FF Safety/Urgent Orange: #FF8C00 Natural/Environmental Green: #228B22 Community Purple: #9370DB Neutral Background: #F5F5F5 Text Black: #2F4F4F Highlight Yellow: #FFD700
Typography:
Headlines: Montserrat Bold (or similar sans-serif)
Body Text: Open Sans Regular (clean, readable)
Data Points: Roboto Mono (for numbers/codes)
Quotes: Playfair Display (elegant serif for quotes)
Icon Set:
- Heritage: 🏛️, 📜, 🖼️
- Technology: 📱, 🖥️, 📡
- Community: 👥, 🤝, 🗣️
- Action: 📋, ✅, 🎯
- Warning: ⚠️, 🚩, ❌
Layout Grid:
- Size: 800px × 2000px (vertical)
- Columns: 12-column grid
- Margins: 40px sides, 30px top/bottom
- Gutters: 20px between columns
Data Visualization Styles:
- Timelines: Horizontal ribbons with milestone markers
- Pyramids: Tiered hierarchies with percentage splits
- Flowcharts: Clear directional arrows with decision diamonds
- Comparisons: Side-by-side before/after layouts
- Statistics: Large numbers with icon accents
Export Formats:
- High-res PNG: For web/social media (300 DPI)
- PDF: For printing/download
- SVG: For editable vector versions
- Interactive HTML: For web implementation
- Print-ready: CMYK with bleed for physical distribution
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE
Usage Scenarios:
EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS:
- Classroom posters
- Student handouts
- Online course materials
- Workshop presentations
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
- Public meeting displays
- Newsletter inserts
- Social media campaigns
- Awareness events
PROFESSIONAL TRAINING:
- Reference materials
- Certification programs
- Conference handouts
- Policy brief attachments
FUNDING APPLICATIONS:
- Grant proposal supplements
- Donor communication
- Impact reporting
- Annual report graphics
Customization Options:
LOCAL ADAPTATION:
- Replace case studies with local examples
- Add local statistics
- Include community photos
- Translate text
- Add local contact information
BRAND INTEGRATION:
- Add organization logo
- Use brand color scheme
- Include specific project data
- Add custom call-to-action
- Link to organization resources
Distribution Strategy:
DIGITAL:
- Website resource section
- Email newsletter series
- Social media carousel posts
- Online community sharing
- Digital toolkits
PHYSICAL:
- Printed posters for community centers
- Laminated reference sheets
- Exhibition displays
- Workshop materials
- Annual report inserts
INTERACTIVE:
- Webpage with clickable elements
- Presentation with animated reveals
- Quiz integration
- Augmented reality overlays
- Downloadable worksheets
These infographics transform complex concepts into visually engaging, easily digestible formats perfect for education, advocacy, and community engagement. Each infographic can stand alone or work together as a comprehensive visual guide to heritage documentation.
